4.1.3 Marxism, the family and capitalism
Engels: the family, the bourgeoise and private property
Engels
– there are two main eras of history of humanity
-
The era of primitive communism
- There
are no families existing in primitive tribes; children were raised by the whole
tribe.
-
The era of capitalism
- Engles
believes that nuclear family based on monogamy is based on the emergence of
capitalism, led to accumulation of private property. And nuclear families
ensure that bourgeoisie were able to pass their legacy to their direct
descendants.
Criticism to Engles
-
There is evidence of the large numbers
of existence of nuclear family in pre – capitalism.
-
Feminism believes that there is no
evidence of the primitive communism era, this could be pure speculations.
Zaretsky – Family as an ideological agency
-
Family is responsible for the
ideological control of the suppression of ideas that may challenge the current
capitalist system.
n By
involving children learning obedience, conformity, showing respect to authority,
turning children into passive, false conscious workers and make then
uncritically except the inequality produced by capitalism.
-
Family worsens the stability of an
adult’s personality because its real function is to help workers manage their
resentment in the workplace. Research by Beynon
found that companies would only employment married men in 1980s since they are
less likely to participate into strike actions because they are unlikely to
engage in actions which threaten their income and therefore their family’s
standard of livings.
-
Some Marxist believes that extended
family are not encouraged because it has socialist ideas such as collectivism
and selflessness rather than capitalist values.
Ansley – powerlessness in the workplace leads
to domestic violence as men attempt to assert power.
-
Wives acts as a safety valve for
capitalism because it makes the workers to not directly spreading his anger to
the real cause of their problem – the nature and organization of capitalism.
Neo-Marxist Marcuse
– Family creates ‘False needs’
Criticism
to Marxist view of Family
-
Interactionist believes that Marxist
rarely consider that working class parents may teach their children values of working-class
culture and empowering their children with knowledge of capitalist inequality.
-
Interactionists argue that Marxism may
be guilty of ignoring the very real emotional and social satisfaction that
people get from being members of a family. The Marxist tendency to write off
such satisfaction as the product of capitalist ideology is both too simplistic
and patronizing.
Comments
Post a Comment